Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(1311 KB)

Lebanon industry value chain development (LIVCD) : final performance evaluation : performance management and support program for Lebanon (PMSPL II)

2019EnglishEvaluated task order title: Lebanon industry value chain development (LIVCD) | Project title: Performance management and support program for Lebanon (PMSPL II) Agricultural developmentCODE: 268; Lebanon

Metadata

Contract/Code
AID-268-C-15-00001 | AID-268-C-12-00001 | re-and-after
Institution
11933 - Social Impact, Inc. 8568 USAID. Mission to Lebanon
Keywords
Apples | Avocados | Cherries | Grapes | Honey | Olives | Rural areas | Value chains AA30 Top/Economics/Economic administration/Value chains (373.5) | Top/Economics/Economic regions/Rural areas (167.25) | Top/Agriculture/Agricultural products/Plant products/Crops/Fruit crops/Temperate fruits/Grapes (118.0)
ID
PA00TTP5
File size
1311 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

Implemented between September 2012 and January 2019, the USAID-funded Lebanon Industry Value Chain Development (LIVCD) project sought to develop inclusive and competitive value chains in rural areas of the country to help increase the income of the population there, including micro, small, and medium enterprises. The evaluation examines the project?s relevance, efficiency and cost-effectiveness, effectiveness, sustainability, and additionality. It provides conclusions and recommendations to inform future activities and follow-on actions. The methods employed included a document review, 64 key-informant interviews, 28 focus group discussions (with 221 individuals), and direct observations.


LIVCD?s performance varied according to the targeted value chain. Interventions with avocado and olive farmers were the most cost-effective, while those with apple and cherry farmers were the least cost-effective. Significant contextual challenges hindered LIVCD?s performance. However, the evaluation found evidence of improved incomes and competitiveness for avocado, olive, and grape farmers in addition to processed-food companies. There was limited or no income improvement for LIVCD-supported apple and cherry farmers. The total value of loans raised was considerable. However, access to finance improved for 102 beneficiaries only and was rather the result of investments leveraged by grants and technical assistance than that of activities aimed at promoting access to finance. Additionality was evident when new technologies or techniques were introduced. The project design included aspects related to ensuring sustainability. However, without further improvements in the quality of the produce, the interventions? sustainability is at risk, especially in the apple value chain.